In 2009 when this article was first published, “getting links through media” meant hoping a newspaper mentioned your website in print and someone typed the URL into their browser. The concept of digital PR as a systematic link building discipline did not exist yet.
Learn more about SEO and GEO optimization services at WPPoland.
Today digital PR is one of the few link building methods that Google’s own rules describe as the normal case rather than the exception. A journalist who cites your research and links to it is doing exactly what the link graph was designed to record. The hard part is earning that citation, and knowing where PR work turns into something Google treats as link spam: paid placements without the right link attribute, advertorials, and press releases stuffed with keyword anchors.
How media groups built links in 2009
In 2009, media and public relations overlapped, and large media groups used that overlap to promote their own brands. The Polish example at the time was the ITI group: on its TVN channel, presenters of one programme appeared as guests in other programmes of the same channel, the talk show host Kuba Wojewódzki invited members of the “Taniec z Gwiazdami” jury to his studio, and film programmes covered releases showing in Multikino, a cinema chain then controlled by the group founded by Mariusz Walter (sources at the time: iti.pl, 6 November 2009, and Dorota Kalinowska, “Kto tu jest gościem”, Press, 2009).
Another approach from that time is what Stephan Spencer called “killer content”: a piece so useful that other media cite it on their own. That idea has aged well. What changed is the scale. A brand outside a media group cannot cross-promote inside one, so it has to give journalists something they want to quote.
Why editorial links from the media matter for SEO
Not all backlinks are equal. A single editorial link from a relevant publication usually does more for a site than a long list of directory submissions, guest posts or social profile links, because it is a decision made by an editor who had no reason to link except that the source was useful.
How a press link differs from a link built for rankings
Google’s spam policies define link spam as “the practice of creating links to or from a site primarily for the purpose of manipulating search rankings.” An editorial citation is the opposite case: the link exists because a journalist needed a source for a reader. That is why PR links sit outside the categories the policy lists, as long as nothing was paid or exchanged for them.
How press coverage relates to E-E-A-T
E-E-A-T comes from Google’s Search Quality Rater Guidelines. The version dated 11 September 2025 tells raters to be skeptical of what a website says about itself and to “look for independent reviews, references, recommendations by experts, news articles, and other sources of credible information about the website.” Raters do not change rankings directly, but the guidelines describe what Google’s systems try to reward. Coverage in independent media is one of the reputation sources the document names.
Do PR links send referral traffic
Yes, when the article reaches the right readers. People who read a story and click through to the cited study arrive with context: they already know why the source matters. Measure it in analytics as referral traffic from each publication rather than assuming it.
How long press links last
Editorial mentions in news articles often stay online for years, because publishers keep their archives. They are not permanent: outlets migrate CMSs, move archives behind paywalls or change URL structures. Check earned links periodically and ask for a correction when a link breaks.
Why competitors cannot copy press links
You cannot buy an editorial citation from a link marketplace, and you cannot manufacture it with a content farm. It requires expertise, a story a journalist wants, and a working relationship with the newsroom. That barrier is what makes the link valuable.
What Google’s spam policies say about PR links
The link spam section of Google’s spam policies lists the practices that turn PR work into a violation. Several of them describe exactly what a careless PR campaign might do:
- “Buying or selling links for ranking purposes”, which explicitly includes “exchanging money for links, or posts that contain links”, “exchanging goods or services for links” and “sending someone a product in exchange for them writing about it and including a link”.
- “Excessive link exchanges” and partner pages that exist only for cross-linking.
- “Advertorials or native advertising where payment is received for articles that include links that pass ranking credit, or links with optimized anchor text in articles, guest posts, or press releases distributed on other sites.”
- “Creating low-value content primarily for the purposes of manipulating linking and ranking signals.”
The same page adds the rule that makes paid media compatible with SEO: buying and selling links “is a normal part of the economy of the web for advertising and sponsorship purposes”, and it is not a violation as long as the links are qualified with rel=“nofollow” or rel=“sponsored”.
In practice the line is simple. If a journalist chose to link, the link is editorial. If the placement was paid for in money, products or services, the link must carry rel=“sponsored”. If the content was written mainly to plant keyword anchors on other sites, it is link spam whatever it is called.
Are press releases with keyword anchors link spam
Yes. Links with optimized anchor text in press releases distributed on other sites are one of the examples in Google’s link spam policy, quoted above. The example entered Google’s link schemes guidelines in July 2013, together with advertorials that pass PageRank and large-scale guest posting with keyword-rich anchors, as Search Engine Land reported at the time.
Google returned to the same pattern in a Search Central post from 25 May 2017, “A reminder about links in large-scale article campaigns”. The post does not discourage articles that inform readers or raise awareness of a company. It names the warning signs when the real goal is links: “stuffing keyword-rich links to your site in your articles”, “having the articles published across many different sites”, using writers who do not know the topic, and “using the same or similar content across these articles”. A press release pushed through a distribution network with exact-match anchors matches every one of them.
That does not make press releases useless. A release still does its original job: it tells journalists that something happened. When a journalist turns it into a story and links to your research or product page, that link is editorial. The release itself should carry plain, branded or URL links and should not be treated as a link source.
When a media placement needs rel=sponsored
Google’s documentation on qualifying outbound links asks publishers to “mark links that are advertisements or paid placements (commonly called paid links) with the sponsored value.” It adds that nofollow “is still an acceptable way to flag them, though sponsored is preferred”, and that several values can be combined in one rel attribute.
| Placement | Who decided to link | Link attribute |
|---|---|---|
| Journalist cites your study in a news story | The journalist and editor | No attribute required |
| Sponsored article or advertorial on a news site | You, through payment | rel=“sponsored” |
| Product sent to a reviewer who links back | Exchange of goods | rel=“sponsored” |
| Paid listing in a “best tools” roundup | You, through payment | rel=“sponsored” |
| Your quote in a reader comment or forum | User-generated content | rel=“ugc” |
Responsibility sits on both sides. In a post from 26 July 2021, “A reminder on qualifying links and our link spam update”, Google warned that sites taking part in “excessive sponsored and guest posting without proper link tags” may face penalties, and that it can apply manual actions as well as algorithmic ones. The December 2022 link spam update went further: SpamBrain can now detect “sites buying links, and sites used for the purpose of passing outgoing links”, and Google said that “any credit passed by these unnatural links are lost” (announcement of 14 December 2022).
There is a second risk for paid content on news domains. Google’s site reputation policy covers third-party content published on a host site “mainly because of that host’s already-established ranking signals”. A sponsored section that exists only to rank on the strength of a newspaper’s domain can fall under that policy even when its links are tagged correctly.
Digital PR link building strategies
1. Original research and data
Original research is the strongest asset in digital PR. Journalists need data to support their stories, and proprietary research gives them something they cannot find elsewhere.
What works:
- Surveys: Survey your customers, industry professionals or target audience about a question journalists already ask. Publish the sample size and how respondents were recruited, because a journalist will check.
- Data analyses: Mine public datasets (government statistics, industry reports, API data) to show a trend or pattern nobody has described yet.
- Proprietary benchmarks: If your business collects performance data (website speed metrics, conversion rates, pricing data), anonymize and aggregate it into benchmarks the industry can reference.
Format matters: Present findings as a report with clear charts. Include a methodology section. Create one page on your website that journalists can link to, with the key numbers in the first screen and the raw data available for download.
2. Expert commentary through HARO and similar services
HARO (Help a Reporter Out) connected journalists with expert sources by email. Its history over the last two years matters for anyone still using old guides. Cision rebranded HARO as Connectively in 2024 and then discontinued it. On 15 April 2025 Cision announced the sale of the HARO platform to Featured.com and confirmed that it no longer offers HARO or Connectively itself. Qwoted and SourceBottle work on the same model.
How to answer journalist requests well:
- Speed: Journalists work on deadlines and often pick from the first useful answers they receive.
- Credentials first: State in one sentence why you are qualified to answer this specific question.
- Quotable insights: Give a short answer that can be quoted as is, then add context.
- Specificity: Use numbers, examples or cases you can back up. Never invent a statistic to sound precise: journalists check, and one false figure ends the relationship.
- Availability: Offer a follow-up by phone or video call.
Answer only requests that match your expertise. A placement earned this way is editorial; a placement bought through a “guaranteed feature” service is a paid link and needs rel=“sponsored”.
3. Newsjacking
Newsjacking means providing expert commentary on breaking news or trending topics. It works only when the comment adds something the first reports did not have.
How to newsjack effectively:
- Monitor industry news using Google Alerts, Feedly and journalist lists on social platforms.
- React within hours, not days. Prepare a short expert statement with an angle that adds context or analysis beyond the basic news.
- Pitch directly to journalists covering the story, with your angle in the subject line.
- Have assets ready: a professional headshot, a short bio and a page on your website that the journalist can link to.
4. Data journalism partnerships
Data journalism is a discipline where journalists analyze datasets to find stories. You can become a trusted data source for these teams.
- Identify data journalists at target publications; many larger outlets have dedicated data desks.
- Offer early or exclusive access to new data before you publish it.
- Provide clean, downloadable datasets in formats journalists can analyze (CSV, Google Sheets).
- Create visualizations that publications can embed with attribution and a link back to the source.
- Be available to explain methodology and the limits of the data.
5. Expert roundups and collaborative content
Instead of creating content alone, involve several experts. Each participant has a reason to share the result, and the combined expertise makes it more citable.
Formats that work:
- Expert Q&A panels: curated questions answered by practitioners.
- Collaborative research: partner with an industry association or a university department for credibility.
- Podcast interviews: publish transcripts and key quotes, so others can cite them.
Keep these collaborations editorial. When participants agree to link to each other as a condition of taking part, the roundup turns into the kind of link exchange covered in our guide to link exchange and link buying strategies, and Google’s policy on “excessive link exchanges” applies.
6. Press releases with a news angle
Releases distributed through wire services are not a link source, for the reasons above. They are still a way to reach journalists when there is real news.
When press releases lead to coverage:
- Newsworthy announcements: product launches with a new angle, significant company milestones, partnerships that change something for customers.
- Research publication: announcing an original research report with its main finding in the first sentence.
- Industry firsts: anything that is verifiably first or largest of its kind.
What does not work: self-congratulatory announcements, minor product updates, routine personnel news. Journalists ignore these.
How to build relationships with journalists
Long-term journalist relationships are the foundation of sustained digital PR.
How to find the right journalists to pitch
- Search for published articles on your topics using Google News, Muck Rack, Cision or Mustr.
- Check social platforms and LinkedIn for journalists active in your niche.
- Read bylines carefully: staff writers and freelancers both matter, and freelancers often write for several outlets.
- Note how often they cover your topic: a journalist who writes about it every week is a better contact than one who touched it once.
How to earn a journalist’s trust
- Follow their work: read their articles before you pitch.
- Provide value first: share relevant data, background information or contacts to other experts without asking for anything.
- Be a reliable source: when a journalist reaches out, answer quickly with clear, quotable information.
- Respect their process: deadlines, preferred channels, and the difference between helpful and pushy.
- Keep in touch: share relevant updates a few times a year without always asking for coverage.
How to track journalist contacts in a CRM
Use a simple CRM (BuzzStream, Pitchbox, or a spreadsheet) to track:
- Journalist name, publication, beat and contact information
- Every interaction (pitches sent, responses received, coverage earned)
- Content preferences and deadlines
- Follow-up schedule
How to measure digital PR link building
Link metrics for digital PR
- Referring domains earned from PR activities
- Relevance of each linking publication to your topic
- Link attribute: editorial followed links, rel=“sponsored” or rel=“nofollow” links, and mentions without a link
- Anchor text: links a journalist chose usually carry your brand, a URL or a descriptive phrase; a pattern of exact-match commercial anchors is the signal Google’s policy describes
Traffic metrics for digital PR
- Referral traffic from publications that linked to you
- Branded search in Google Search Console after coverage
- Direct traffic changes around publication dates
SEO metrics for digital PR
- Rankings for the topics the coverage was about
- Organic traffic to the pages journalists linked
Business metrics for digital PR
- Lead quality from PR referral traffic
- Conversion rate of PR visitors compared with other channels
- Brand mentions in media and search
Record the starting point before a campaign. Without a baseline, a later increase in rankings or branded searches cannot be attributed to the coverage.
Digital PR pitching mistakes to avoid
Mass emailing generic pitches: Journalists receive large numbers of pitches. Reference their recent work and explain why your story matters to their readers.
Pitching without a news angle: “We launched a new product” is not news. A finding from your own data that nobody has published is.
Ignoring timing: Pitch while the topic is in the news cycle, not months later.
Neglecting follow-up: One follow-up a few days after the first pitch is acceptable. Repeated follow-ups read as spam.
Expecting instant results: Coverage depends on news cycles you do not control. Plan PR as a program that runs for months, not a single send.
Asking for specific anchor text: A journalist decides how to cite a source. Asking for a keyword anchor, or offering payment for one, turns an editorial link into exactly what Google’s link spam policy describes.
Using PR purely for links: Journalists notice when the only goal is a link. Helpfulness (expert context, exclusive data, availability for interviews) is what builds relationships that produce coverage again.
How digital PR differs from link networks and bought links
Digital PR, link networks and bought links all end with a link on another site, but Google judges them by how the link came about. A private network of your own sites exists to pass ranking signals, and it falls under the same link spam policy quoted above. Buying links can be legitimate advertising only when the links are qualified as sponsored; the link exchange guide linked above covers where that line runs. Our link building case study from the furniture industry shows how a network-based approach was built in practice.
Digital PR is slower than any of them, and it depends on having something worth reporting. It is also the method that does not need to be hidden from anyone: not from the journalist, not from the reader, and not from Google. If you are not sure whether a past campaign crossed the line, start with our overview of common link building mistakes and penalties.







