We are not just a remote agency. We are an active part of the ecosystem. We believe in Open Source and contributing back to the community that powers over 40% of the web (W3Techs).
Specific Context: Scalable architecture, strong security standards, and enterprise integrations tailored to local market requirements.
Connecting with fellow developers in the Kraków region.
Join us at the next event →In Kraków's competitive market, site speed is your strongest SEO asset. Our Astro + Headless WP stack delivers performance that leaves competitors behind.
For businesses in Kraków serving Software Houses & Global SSCs, data security is paramount. Headless architecture virtually eliminates standard WordPress attack vectors.
Kraków is no longer only a cultural destination. It is one of Central Europe’s densest technology clusters, and the WordPress sites that serve its software houses, shared-service centres and tourism operators need maintenance that matches the engineering bar set by the city’s R&D offices. This page covers ongoing WordPress maintenance in Kraków: tested updates, backups, security and performance monitoring, with priority support under a written SLA.
Businesses in Kraków compete on digital presence that directly affects revenue. A brochure site that loads slowly during a festival announcement, a WooCommerce checkout that drops sessions when Przelewy24 has a slow moment, or a corporate portal that fails a procurement questionnaire on patch discipline are not abstract risks. They are operational failures that maintenance is meant to prevent.
My approach to WordPress maintenance in Kraków combines senior engineering depth with practical business context. The work is not “keeping the lights on”. It is active protection of a site your team depends on: updates tested before production, backups you can actually restore, monitoring that alerts before customers notice, and a documented response path when something breaks at the wrong hour.
Kraków Technology Park and the Zabłocie district anchor a concentration of technical teams and digital-first companies. That density raises the bar for WordPress maintenance beyond template hosting with an upsell checkbox.
The typical client base in Kraków includes software houses and global shared-service centres. These organisations need maintenance that integrates with existing business systems, scales with growth and satisfies procurement questions on security, accessibility and data protection. A Kraków SSC running internal tools alongside a customer-facing WordPress property often asks the same questions a Western parent company would: patch cadence, incident logging, backup restore tests and evidence that GDPR obligations are operational, not buried in a policy PDF.
Poland’s digital economy keeps expanding, and Kraków sits at the front of that wave. Companies in Kraków increasingly treat the website as a core business tool that needs professional engineering and continuous investment, not a one-off project handed to marketing and forgotten.
The local WordPress community meets through WordUp Kraków, which is a useful signal for anyone hiring maintenance: the city has practitioners who discuss real production problems, not only plugin roundups.
Incident management follows an ITIL-lite rhythm: detect, triage, resolve, post-mortem. Every incident ends with a root-cause note. SLA compliance is tracked against agreed uptime targets target, with recovery time measured and reported in the monthly status document.
Updates never go straight to production. Each cycle runs on a staging environment that mirrors production plugin versions and PHP settings, passes basic regression checks, and ships with a documented rollback path. Security patches for critical vulnerabilities can move faster, but the sequence stays the same: reproduce, fix, verify, promote.
Every maintenance engagement in Kraków follows a structured process that minimises risk and keeps decisions visible:
Businesses in Kraków regularly arrive with the same production pain points:
A Kraków cultural institution once inherited a multilingual WordPress site where each language had grown independently. Maintenance was not only updates; it was keeping four editorial workflows from diverging every time a plugin added a new setting. That pattern repeats across tourism and events sites in the city, where traffic spikes follow programme announcements rather than a steady e-commerce curve.
WordPress maintenance projects in Kraków should produce numbers, not reassurance:
I do not quote generic guarantees. Success signals are agreed at onboarding: uptime, Core Web Vitals, security scan results, search visibility stability or checkout reliability, depending on what the site actually does.
More than 500 WordPress projects since 2007 means I have seen every CMS trend arrive and leave. I know what survives production, what breaks at scale and what clients actually need versus what they think they need.
This is not a generic hosting company that adds maintenance as an upsell. I am a developer who maintains sites I built and sites others built. I read the code because I write it.
Every maintenance client gets a dedicated technical contact who knows the site architecture, business context and publishing process. No tier-1 script queue, no handoffs between departments who have never opened the theme.
Kraków’s engineering culture helps here. The city trains developers at AGH University of Science and Technology and the Jagiellonian University, and employs them in global R&D centres where code review and documentation are daily practice. Maintenance delivered from that context looks like small reviewable changes and written decisions, not heroic weekend fixes nobody can explain on Monday.
Local context should support the service, not distract from it. For Kraków I keep evidence tied to WordPress maintenance: conversion loss when performance regresses, editorial friction when updates break the block editor, security exposure when plugins fall behind, search visibility when Core Web Vitals slip, integration debt when WooCommerce callbacks fail silently, and operational cost when every change requires an emergency developer.
That keeps the page useful for buyers in Kraków comparing providers: when maintenance is worth doing, what evidence to gather first, and which implementation choices create measurable progress.
Security is built into every maintained site from the first configuration review. Projects in Kraków include hardened server settings, Web Application Firewall rules tuned to WordPress attack patterns, prepared database queries, output escaping against cross-site scripting, nonce verification on form submissions and rate limiting on authentication endpoints. Incident response covers detection, containment and post-event documentation; response times are defined in the maintenance agreement.
GDPR and UODO expectations shape maintenance work for Polish and EU-facing sites. The General Data Protection Regulation sets the legal frame; in Poland the UODO (Urząd Ochrony Danych Osobowych, the Personal Data Protection Office) supervises enforcement and publishes guidance that procurement teams in Kraków increasingly cite in vendor questionnaires. Maintenance is where compliance becomes operational:
For companies now in scope of NIS2, the practical layer on a public WordPress site is patch discipline, logging, access control and a documented update path, especially when the site connects to internal systems. Kraków SSCs often run security reviews written for parent companies in London or Frankfurt; maintenance reports that show tested updates, backup restore tests and incident timelines answer those reviewers in language they already use.
Core Web Vitals are ranking signals and user-experience signals at once. Sites maintained in Kraków are tuned to stay inside Google’s performance thresholds:
These metrics are monitored continuously. A regression triggers an alert and blocks promotion from staging until the cause is identified. Performance decisions are measured before and after, not argued from memory.
What happens if requirements change mid-engagement? Changes are normal. The sprint-based process accommodates scope adjustments between iterations. Impact on timeline and budget is discussed transparently, approval is recorded and the plan updates.
What does ongoing support include? Maintenance packages cover tested WordPress, plugin and theme updates, daily backups with 30-day retention, uptime monitoring, security scanning and dedicated developer hours for small changes. Details are in the monthly report, not hidden in a generic SLA PDF.
Can you migrate our existing site? Yes. Migrations from other CMS platforms to WordPress, from WordPress to headless architectures where justified, and between hosting providers are in scope. Each migration includes URL mapping, 301 redirect implementation and SEO monitoring for 90 days after cutover.
How are payment terms structured? Ongoing maintenance is invoiced monthly. Project remediation work uses milestone billing documented in the agreement before work starts. Pricing is individual and tied to scope established in the audit.
How long does onboarding take? A standard corporate site typically needs one to two weeks from audit to steady-state maintenance, depending on remediation backlog. WooCommerce stores with payment and fulfilment integrations often need longer in the first month because staging must mirror production callbacks, not only the catalog.
This page stays focused on WordPress maintenance. The work is scoped around the service named in the title: current-state review, risk map, implementation priorities, acceptance criteria and post-launch verification for businesses in Kraków.
When another platform appears during discovery, I treat it as project context, not as a reason to change the topic. The output remains a clear plan for WordPress maintenance: what must change, what can stay, what to measure and what to postpone.
A well-built site only helps if your audience in Kraków can find it. Maintenance includes the technical SEO foundation that editorial teams depend on:
SEO is not a post-launch add-on. It is part of architectural decisions from the first maintenance cycle.
Local proof should support maintenance decisions, not drift into unrelated technology pitches. In Kraków I keep arguments tied to WordPress maintenance: platform constraints, compliance expectations, search visibility, content operations, integration risk and the technical changes needed to make progress.
Community references and vendor names belong on the page only when they explain a real implementation choice. Otherwise the engagement stays anchored in written assumptions, measurable acceptance criteria and a clear delivery path.
The most common maintenance ticket reads “the site slowed down”. That is a symptom, not a cause, so diagnosis starts at the network layer and works down, not at the cache plugin.
First measurement: raw server response time. Run curl with -w and time_starttransfer against the homepage, then against a URL that bypasses page cache, for example ?nocache=1. If the first result is low and the second high, page cache is masking a slow backend and the problem is PHP or the database. If both are high, check DNS, TLS and server location before touching code. A server in Frankfurt serving traffic mostly from Małopolska adds tens of milliseconds per connection; with a dozen third-party assets that compounds into a visible delay.
Second step: profile the request. Query Monitor shows SQL query count, slow queries, hook execution time and synchronous outbound HTTP calls during render. A typical culprit is a plugin calling an external API in init or wp_loaded. A courier integration, payment gateway or warehouse API that responds slowly, combined with wp_remote_get without a short timeout, can block the entire request. WordPress defaults to a five-second HTTP timeout; one slow external service can make the site feel down.
Third area: wp_options and autoload data. Autoloaded options should sum to hundreds of kilobytes, not megabytes. Plugins removed without proper uninstallation leave autoload rows, expired transients and orphaned metadata. A query summing LENGTH(option_value) for autoload rows takes seconds and points to specific plugins. From WordPress 6.6 onward the autoload column uses values on, off, auto, auto-on and auto-off, so filters limited to legacy 'yes' miss rows on updated installs.
Cart and cache conflicts are a separate category on WooCommerce sites common in Kraków retail and tourism. WooCommerce sets session cookies; full-page cache cannot serve cart, checkout or account views from memory. Symptoms are characteristic: cart shows zero items after add until refresh, or a visitor sees another user’s cart state. The fix excludes cart, checkout and account paths from cache, disables cache for requests carrying woocommerce_items_in_cart, and moves the cart counter to a client-loaded fragment.
Email latency is the last layer. WordPress sends transactional mail synchronously in the same request as checkout submission by default. A slow SMTP handshake adds directly to checkout response time. The fix is an Action Scheduler queue with real system cron, not visitor-triggered wp-cron.php.
The legal frame is now dual-track in Poland. The 2019 act on digital accessibility of public sector websites requires WCAG 2.1 Level AA for public bodies. The European Accessibility Act, transposed in Poland through the act on accessibility requirements for products and services, extends similar expectations to private sectors including e-commerce, banking, passenger transport and telecoms from June 2025 onward. For Kraków SSCs and technology vendors, accessibility now appears in procurement questionnaires alongside security and GDPR. The team that maintains the site owns the ongoing fixes.
Contrast is the cheapest fix and the most common failure. Required ratios are 4.5:1 for normal text, 3:1 for large text and for borders of form fields and meaningful icons. In block themes the palette lives in theme.json; in classic themes in CSS variables. Typical failures are grey helper text under fields, light-green buttons with white labels and placeholders pretending to be labels.
Keyboard focus disappears with one line of CSS. outline: none without a replacement leaves Tab navigation invisible. Use :focus-visible with at least a two-pixel outline and offset. Check that sticky headers and consent banners do not cover the focused element, and that a skip link is first in tab order and visible on focus.
Labels and accessible names are template work, not editor work. Every field needs a label tied with for and id, errors linked through aria-describedby, and aria-invalid="true" on invalid fields. Icon-only buttons and modal close controls need accessible names. Repeated “read more” links should describe the destination.
Heading order follows the template. One h1 per page, no jumps from h2 to h4, and post loops must not impose heading levels independent of context. Screen reader heading navigation or an accessibility tree view catches this in minutes.
Testing combines automated and manual passes. axe DevTools or pa11y catch mechanical rules; the rest needs a full checkout path navigated by keyboard only, form fields listened to in NVDA or VoiceOver, 200% zoom without horizontal scroll at 320px width.
Regression returns on the first theme update. Fixes belong in a child theme or custom plugin, never in parent theme files that updates overwrite. Run axe on staging before and after each update cycle and compare results. Acceptance criteria include an accessibility line item; update the accessibility statement when templates change. Scope for remediation is priced individually because depth depends on how heavily the theme was customised.
WooCommerce stores in Kraków are covered on the WooCommerce developer in Kraków page. Central teams comparing maintenance cadence should also read WordPress maintenance in Warsaw and WordPress maintenance in Gdańsk.
For custom development beyond maintenance scope, see WordPress developer in Kraków.
If your business in Kraków needs professional WordPress maintenance, send a written summary of the current stack, constraints and goals. I will review the context and return a practical recommendation with assumptions, risks and acceptance criteria.
Every successful engagement starts with clear communication and shared expectations. The initial consultation covers business goals, technical requirements, timeline constraints and budget parameters.
For stable update cadence outside the largest markets, see also WordPress maintenance in Poznań, WordPress maintenance in Wrocław and WordPress maintenance in Łódź.
Last updated: 28 August 2026
We serve clients in Kraków and nearby areas.
This page features specific insights for Kraków.
Kraków is no longer only a cultural destination. It is one of Central Europe’s densest technology clusters, and the WordPress sites that serve its software houses, shared-service centres and tourism operators need maintenance that matches the engineering bar set by the city’s R&D offices. This page covers ongoing WordPress maintenance in Kraków: tested updates, backups, security and performance monitoring, with priority support under a written SLA.
Businesses in Kraków compete on digital presence that directly affects revenue. A brochure site that loads slowly during a festival announcement, a WooCommerce checkout that drops sessions when Przelewy24 has a slow moment, or a corporate portal that fails a procurement questionnaire on patch discipline are not abstract risks. They are operational failures that maintenance is meant to prevent.
My approach to WordPress maintenance in Kraków combines senior engineering depth with practical business context. The work is not “keeping the lights on”. It is active protection of a site your team depends on: updates tested before production, backups you can actually restore, monitoring that alerts before customers notice, and a documented response path when something breaks at the wrong hour.
Kraków Technology Park and the Zabłocie district anchor a concentration of technical teams and digital-first companies. That density raises the bar for WordPress maintenance beyond template hosting with an upsell checkbox.
The typical client base in Kraków includes software houses and global shared-service centres. These organisations need maintenance that integrates with existing business systems, scales with growth and satisfies procurement questions on security, accessibility and data protection. A Kraków SSC running internal tools alongside a customer-facing WordPress property often asks the same questions a Western parent company would: patch cadence, incident logging, backup restore tests and evidence that GDPR obligations are operational, not buried in a policy PDF.
Poland’s digital economy keeps expanding, and Kraków sits at the front of that wave. Companies in Kraków increasingly treat the website as a core business tool that needs professional engineering and continuous investment, not a one-off project handed to marketing and forgotten.
The local WordPress community meets through WordUp Kraków, which is a useful signal for anyone hiring maintenance: the city has practitioners who discuss real production problems, not only plugin roundups.
Incident management follows an ITIL-lite rhythm: detect, triage, resolve, post-mortem. Every incident ends with a root-cause note. SLA compliance is tracked against agreed uptime targets target, with recovery time measured and reported in the monthly status document.
Updates never go straight to production. Each cycle runs on a staging environment that mirrors production plugin versions and PHP settings, passes basic regression checks, and ships with a documented rollback path. Security patches for critical vulnerabilities can move faster, but the sequence stays the same: reproduce, fix, verify, promote.
Every maintenance engagement in Kraków follows a structured process that minimises risk and keeps decisions visible:
Businesses in Kraków regularly arrive with the same production pain points:
A Kraków cultural institution once inherited a multilingual WordPress site where each language had grown independently. Maintenance was not only updates; it was keeping four editorial workflows from diverging every time a plugin added a new setting. That pattern repeats across tourism and events sites in the city, where traffic spikes follow programme announcements rather than a steady e-commerce curve.
WordPress maintenance projects in Kraków should produce numbers, not reassurance:
I do not quote generic guarantees. Success signals are agreed at onboarding: uptime, Core Web Vitals, security scan results, search visibility stability or checkout reliability, depending on what the site actually does.
More than 500 WordPress projects since 2007 means I have seen every CMS trend arrive and leave. I know what survives production, what breaks at scale and what clients actually need versus what they think they need.
This is not a generic hosting company that adds maintenance as an upsell. I am a developer who maintains sites I built and sites others built. I read the code because I write it.
Every maintenance client gets a dedicated technical contact who knows the site architecture, business context and publishing process. No tier-1 script queue, no handoffs between departments who have never opened the theme.
Kraków’s engineering culture helps here. The city trains developers at AGH University of Science and Technology and the Jagiellonian University, and employs them in global R&D centres where code review and documentation are daily practice. Maintenance delivered from that context looks like small reviewable changes and written decisions, not heroic weekend fixes nobody can explain on Monday.
Local context should support the service, not distract from it. For Kraków I keep evidence tied to WordPress maintenance: conversion loss when performance regresses, editorial friction when updates break the block editor, security exposure when plugins fall behind, search visibility when Core Web Vitals slip, integration debt when WooCommerce callbacks fail silently, and operational cost when every change requires an emergency developer.
That keeps the page useful for buyers in Kraków comparing providers: when maintenance is worth doing, what evidence to gather first, and which implementation choices create measurable progress.
Security is built into every maintained site from the first configuration review. Projects in Kraków include hardened server settings, Web Application Firewall rules tuned to WordPress attack patterns, prepared database queries, output escaping against cross-site scripting, nonce verification on form submissions and rate limiting on authentication endpoints. Incident response covers detection, containment and post-event documentation; response times are defined in the maintenance agreement.
GDPR and UODO expectations shape maintenance work for Polish and EU-facing sites. The General Data Protection Regulation sets the legal frame; in Poland the UODO (Urząd Ochrony Danych Osobowych, the Personal Data Protection Office) supervises enforcement and publishes guidance that procurement teams in Kraków increasingly cite in vendor questionnaires. Maintenance is where compliance becomes operational:
For companies now in scope of NIS2, the practical layer on a public WordPress site is patch discipline, logging, access control and a documented update path, especially when the site connects to internal systems. Kraków SSCs often run security reviews written for parent companies in London or Frankfurt; maintenance reports that show tested updates, backup restore tests and incident timelines answer those reviewers in language they already use.
Core Web Vitals are ranking signals and user-experience signals at once. Sites maintained in Kraków are tuned to stay inside Google’s performance thresholds:
These metrics are monitored continuously. A regression triggers an alert and blocks promotion from staging until the cause is identified. Performance decisions are measured before and after, not argued from memory.
What happens if requirements change mid-engagement? Changes are normal. The sprint-based process accommodates scope adjustments between iterations. Impact on timeline and budget is discussed transparently, approval is recorded and the plan updates.
What does ongoing support include? Maintenance packages cover tested WordPress, plugin and theme updates, daily backups with 30-day retention, uptime monitoring, security scanning and dedicated developer hours for small changes. Details are in the monthly report, not hidden in a generic SLA PDF.
Can you migrate our existing site? Yes. Migrations from other CMS platforms to WordPress, from WordPress to headless architectures where justified, and between hosting providers are in scope. Each migration includes URL mapping, 301 redirect implementation and SEO monitoring for 90 days after cutover.
How are payment terms structured? Ongoing maintenance is invoiced monthly. Project remediation work uses milestone billing documented in the agreement before work starts. Pricing is individual and tied to scope established in the audit.
How long does onboarding take? A standard corporate site typically needs one to two weeks from audit to steady-state maintenance, depending on remediation backlog. WooCommerce stores with payment and fulfilment integrations often need longer in the first month because staging must mirror production callbacks, not only the catalog.
This page stays focused on WordPress maintenance. The work is scoped around the service named in the title: current-state review, risk map, implementation priorities, acceptance criteria and post-launch verification for businesses in Kraków.
When another platform appears during discovery, I treat it as project context, not as a reason to change the topic. The output remains a clear plan for WordPress maintenance: what must change, what can stay, what to measure and what to postpone.
A well-built site only helps if your audience in Kraków can find it. Maintenance includes the technical SEO foundation that editorial teams depend on:
SEO is not a post-launch add-on. It is part of architectural decisions from the first maintenance cycle.
Local proof should support maintenance decisions, not drift into unrelated technology pitches. In Kraków I keep arguments tied to WordPress maintenance: platform constraints, compliance expectations, search visibility, content operations, integration risk and the technical changes needed to make progress.
Community references and vendor names belong on the page only when they explain a real implementation choice. Otherwise the engagement stays anchored in written assumptions, measurable acceptance criteria and a clear delivery path.
The most common maintenance ticket reads “the site slowed down”. That is a symptom, not a cause, so diagnosis starts at the network layer and works down, not at the cache plugin.
First measurement: raw server response time. Run curl with -w and time_starttransfer against the homepage, then against a URL that bypasses page cache, for example ?nocache=1. If the first result is low and the second high, page cache is masking a slow backend and the problem is PHP or the database. If both are high, check DNS, TLS and server location before touching code. A server in Frankfurt serving traffic mostly from Małopolska adds tens of milliseconds per connection; with a dozen third-party assets that compounds into a visible delay.
Second step: profile the request. Query Monitor shows SQL query count, slow queries, hook execution time and synchronous outbound HTTP calls during render. A typical culprit is a plugin calling an external API in init or wp_loaded. A courier integration, payment gateway or warehouse API that responds slowly, combined with wp_remote_get without a short timeout, can block the entire request. WordPress defaults to a five-second HTTP timeout; one slow external service can make the site feel down.
Third area: wp_options and autoload data. Autoloaded options should sum to hundreds of kilobytes, not megabytes. Plugins removed without proper uninstallation leave autoload rows, expired transients and orphaned metadata. A query summing LENGTH(option_value) for autoload rows takes seconds and points to specific plugins. From WordPress 6.6 onward the autoload column uses values on, off, auto, auto-on and auto-off, so filters limited to legacy 'yes' miss rows on updated installs.
Cart and cache conflicts are a separate category on WooCommerce sites common in Kraków retail and tourism. WooCommerce sets session cookies; full-page cache cannot serve cart, checkout or account views from memory. Symptoms are characteristic: cart shows zero items after add until refresh, or a visitor sees another user’s cart state. The fix excludes cart, checkout and account paths from cache, disables cache for requests carrying woocommerce_items_in_cart, and moves the cart counter to a client-loaded fragment.
Email latency is the last layer. WordPress sends transactional mail synchronously in the same request as checkout submission by default. A slow SMTP handshake adds directly to checkout response time. The fix is an Action Scheduler queue with real system cron, not visitor-triggered wp-cron.php.
The legal frame is now dual-track in Poland. The 2019 act on digital accessibility of public sector websites requires WCAG 2.1 Level AA for public bodies. The European Accessibility Act, transposed in Poland through the act on accessibility requirements for products and services, extends similar expectations to private sectors including e-commerce, banking, passenger transport and telecoms from June 2025 onward. For Kraków SSCs and technology vendors, accessibility now appears in procurement questionnaires alongside security and GDPR. The team that maintains the site owns the ongoing fixes.
Contrast is the cheapest fix and the most common failure. Required ratios are 4.5:1 for normal text, 3:1 for large text and for borders of form fields and meaningful icons. In block themes the palette lives in theme.json; in classic themes in CSS variables. Typical failures are grey helper text under fields, light-green buttons with white labels and placeholders pretending to be labels.
Keyboard focus disappears with one line of CSS. outline: none without a replacement leaves Tab navigation invisible. Use :focus-visible with at least a two-pixel outline and offset. Check that sticky headers and consent banners do not cover the focused element, and that a skip link is first in tab order and visible on focus.
Labels and accessible names are template work, not editor work. Every field needs a label tied with for and id, errors linked through aria-describedby, and aria-invalid="true" on invalid fields. Icon-only buttons and modal close controls need accessible names. Repeated “read more” links should describe the destination.
Heading order follows the template. One h1 per page, no jumps from h2 to h4, and post loops must not impose heading levels independent of context. Screen reader heading navigation or an accessibility tree view catches this in minutes.
Testing combines automated and manual passes. axe DevTools or pa11y catch mechanical rules; the rest needs a full checkout path navigated by keyboard only, form fields listened to in NVDA or VoiceOver, 200% zoom without horizontal scroll at 320px width.
Regression returns on the first theme update. Fixes belong in a child theme or custom plugin, never in parent theme files that updates overwrite. Run axe on staging before and after each update cycle and compare results. Acceptance criteria include an accessibility line item; update the accessibility statement when templates change. Scope for remediation is priced individually because depth depends on how heavily the theme was customised.
WooCommerce stores in Kraków are covered on the WooCommerce developer in Kraków page. Central teams comparing maintenance cadence should also read WordPress maintenance in Warsaw and WordPress maintenance in Gdańsk.
For custom development beyond maintenance scope, see WordPress developer in Kraków.
If your business in Kraków needs professional WordPress maintenance, send a written summary of the current stack, constraints and goals. I will review the context and return a practical recommendation with assumptions, risks and acceptance criteria.
Every successful engagement starts with clear communication and shared expectations. The initial consultation covers business goals, technical requirements, timeline constraints and budget parameters.
For stable update cadence outside the largest markets, see also WordPress maintenance in Poznań, WordPress maintenance in Wrocław and WordPress maintenance in Łódź.
Last updated: 28 August 2026
We have co-organised WordCamp Gdynia since 2015 and worked on the WordCamp Europe organising team since 2024. What we learn at those events goes back into the code we write for clients.
Explore selected projects supporting our clients' success.
kochamruch.pl is a website for a community focused on movement and physical activity, with content publishing and stable technical foundations.
kredytywarszawa.pl is a WordPress website for a business offering loans and financial services, focused on clear services, performance, and basic security.
led-lumina.pl is a professional online store that presents a comprehensive range of innovative LED solutions for both individual and business customers. The ...
How we approach AI citations, WooCommerce B2B modernization, and NIS2-aligned operational resilience on WordPress. These guides apply to every client location.
Local expertise: - Senior WordPress maintenance for businesses in Kraków, including SSCs, software houses and tourism operators - Tested updates, daily backups with 30-day retention, malware scanning and WAF - Uptime and PageSpeed monitoring with documented SLA response times Our team understands the Kraków market and tailors solutions to local business needs. Key project decisions are based on real data from the Kraków market, not template assumptions.
Let's discuss how we can bring top-tier performance to your project.
Schedule free consultation in KrakówStay updated with the WordPress Maintenance & Support community
Since 26 August 2026, links in Google results go through google.com/goto instead of straight to the page. What this changes in analytics, in rank tracking tools and in WordPress, and what it does not change at all.
WP Rocket 3.23.2.1 and earlier fatal on WordPress 7.1: TypeError in Cloudflare.php line 562. GitHub report 6 July, sites down 19 August, fix 3.23.2.2 on 20 August. Update the plugin first.
Google now expands AI Overviews to a full AI Mode answer on some queries and pushes the ten blue links down. Our Search Console numbers on offer URLs at positions 2 to 4, and what we changed so the overview has a fact to cite.
Google changed its JSON-LD extraction and now applies only one pass of HTML unescaping. Double-escaped entities are no longer unrolled, so the block stops parsing and the structured data disappears. How to measure your own corpus and how to encode it correctly.
Google splits site reputation manual actions by searcher location from 30 August 2026. Outside the EEA the demotion still hits the affected portion. Inside the EEA that impact does not apply; the section may rank independently. Why parasite SEO does not return.
More articles are available on /en/blog/
Kraków Technology Park & Zabłocie. That matters for a build brief in one concrete way: it tells you which stacks local hires already know, and a handover only survives if someone in the city can pick the codebase up.
The work comes mostly from Software Houses & Global SSCs. Scalable architecture, strong security standards, and enterprise integrations tailored to local market requirements. The acceptance list for Poland runs through GDPR, NIS2 and EAA. None of that is specific to Kraków, it applies market-wide, but it is cheaper written into the scope than retrofitted after launch.
Yes. The audit phase identifies critical issues (outdated PHP, vulnerable plugins, broken backups, malware, performance regressions) and produces a remediation list before steady maintenance begins. The first month of an inherited project usually involves more remediation than maintenance.
Strengthen your business with professional technical support in key areas of the WordPress ecosystem.
CrUX field-data audit with per-template LCP, INP, CLS attribution.
Core Web Vitals, caching, and faster delivery.
Stability, updates, and post-launch support.
Migration to Astro, Next.js, and headless WordPress.
Headless WordPress, Sanity, Strapi, and Contentful with Astro or Next.js.
Audit, hardening, and incident risk reduction.
How to optimize Interaction to Next Paint (INP) on WordPress sites. Practical fixes for the newest Core Web Vital metric that directly impacts Google rankings.
Field versus lab, LCP, INP and CLS for WordPress in 2026. Google's green LCP is still 2.5 s in CrUX. 100/100 in Lighthouse is a lab target. Edge HTML, consent banners, checkout widgets.
Compare the best image optimisation plugins for WordPress, configure WebP/AVIF delivery, extract critical CSS, and set up LiteSpeed Cache for maximum PageSpeed scores.