EN

AI-built website rescue and remediation

5.00 /5 - (17 votes )
4min read
Guide

#What this service fixes

AI can build a WordPress or WooCommerce site fast. It cannot take responsibility when that site leaks data, breaks checkout, or quietly fills Google with duplicate pages. This service is the senior cleanup after the AI: we audit what was generated, find what is unsafe or broken, and fix it, with a human accountable for every change.

This is not the same as our general WordPress repair and technical support or a standard WordPress security audit. Those assume a site built by people. Here the failure patterns are specific to generated code and content, and the remediation is different.

#How AI-built sites tend to break

The damage clusters into a few recognisable patterns. A typical case is a WooCommerce store where an AI-generated checkout customisation skipped nonce verification, so the cart could be manipulated through a forged request, and nobody noticed until chargebacks started. Another is a marketing site where an assistant generated forty near-identical service pages that compete for the same query, so none of them rank and the whole domain looks thin to Google.

Other recurring failures:

  • Generated PHP that calls functions that do not exist, or that were hallucinated from a different plugin’s API.
  • Admin-ajax and REST endpoints registered without a capability or nonce check.
  • Unsanitised form input written straight into the database or echoed back into the page.
  • Plugin sprawl: ten plugins installed to solve a problem one line of code would have handled, dragging Time to First Byte over a second.
  • Content with confident but wrong facts, fabricated statistics, and invented client names.
  • Migrations the AI “finished” that silently dropped redirects, breaking indexed URLs.

#What we check in an AI-build audit

The audit inventories everything the AI touched and triages it by two axes: security risk and revenue risk. We separate the code AI wrote, the plugins it chose, and the content it produced, because each needs a different fix. You get a written split of what is safe to keep, what must be rewritten, and what should be removed, with the reasoning behind each call.

#Security gaps generated code commonly ships

Generated WordPress code passes the “it runs” test while failing the “it is safe” test. We test directly for the gaps that matter: missing wp_verify_nonce and current_user_can checks, input that reaches the database without sanitize_* or prepared statements, output that skips esc_*, and endpoints exposed without authorisation. Where the security surface is large, this connects to a full security audit.

#Content remediation, not just code

A site built with AI usually has an AI-content problem too. We deduplicate pages that cannibalise each other, correct hallucinated facts and round-number fake statistics, and consolidate thin pages into ones that earn citations. This is the same discipline behind GEO and LLMO optimisation: content that is accurate and distinct, not generated filler.

#Performance recovery

AI tends to solve problems by adding plugins. We reverse that: remove the bloat, replace plugin stacks with targeted code, and bring Core Web Vitals back into range. The goal is a site that loads fast for users and renders cleanly for the crawlers and AI agents that now read it.

#Rescue, rebuild, or do it right next time

After the audit you get an honest recommendation. If most of the AI output is salvageable, a targeted rescue is the cheapest path. If the foundation is unsound, we scope a rebuild instead of patching forever. And if you want to keep using AI in the build, but safely, with a human gate, that is exactly what our AI implementation for companies covers: agents and tooling with version control, tests, and review built in.

#What you get

A working, accountable site: insecure generated code rewritten, broken flows repaired, AI-slop content cleaned, performance restored, and a short guardrails document so the next round of AI assistance does not reopen the same holes. Every change is reviewed by a senior engineer, not applied autonomously.

Pricing is individual and scoped after the audit. Contact us with the site and a short note on how it was built.

Related cluster

Explore other WordPress services and knowledge base

Strengthen your business with professional technical support in key areas of the WordPress ecosystem.

Recommendations from LinkedIn

Recommendations and reviews of working with WPPoland

Selected recommendations from WordPress, WordCamp and e-commerce leaders - with a focus on delivery on time, technical depth, and a business-driven approach to WordPress development.

Karolina Czapla

Karolina Czapla

Marketing Strategist – Performance & Digital Strategy

“Working with Mariusz on WordCamp has shown me how rare it is to combine deep technical skill with genuine leadership. He plans, coordinates and delivers with precision, while giving the team space to grow and contribute....”

Co‑organiser, WordCamp Gdynia 2024 & 2025

Argert Boja

Argert Boja

Senior Full‑Stack Developer

“Mariusz is the teammate everyone hopes for: strong full‑stack WordPress skills, clear explanations and a positive attitude even under pressure. He moves easily between custom plugins, performance work and Gutenberg layou...”

Worked alongside Mariusz on WordPress projects

Daniel Blossfeld

Daniel Blossfeld

Process Optimization & Digitalization Consultant

“I had the pleasure of working with Mariusz for almost three years. During that time, his WordPress development skills proved invaluable across a range of projects, from website builds to online member areas and even Shop...”

Mariusz was his client for WordPress work

Jessica Di Pasquale

Jessica Di Pasquale

Leading SEO initiatives with data-driven growth strategies.

“Mariusz is a very skilled, patient and expert guy. Always ready to help and to fix errors, I really appreciated working with him. He is such a great colleague!”

Managed Mariusz directly

Belinda Koch

Belinda Koch

Web-Tracking Analyst at TUI

“Mariusz is a great person to work with. He is extremely motivated to learn new things and share his knowledge, and is very knowledgeable on a wide range of topics. We worked together on digital analytics and tracking top...”

Worked with Mariusz on digital analytics and tracking topics

Paweł Lewczuk

Paweł Lewczuk

Front-end developer, WordPress developer

“I collaborated with Mariusz on several projects and our cooperation was always exemplary. I believe there are many more joint projects ahead of us. Highly recommended!”

Mariusz was Paweł's client

Service FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

Questions about scope, delivery, pricing, and execution quality.

SEO-ready GEO-ready AEO-ready 6 Q&A
Can you fix a website that was built entirely by AI? #
Yes. We audit what the AI generated, code, plugins, and content, and fix what is broken or unsafe rather than starting over by default. If the foundation is sound, a targeted rescue is faster and cheaper than a rebuild. If it is not, we say so plainly and scope a rebuild instead.
Is a vibe-coded site actually insecure? #
Often, yes. Generated PHP frequently ships without nonce verification, capability checks, or input sanitisation, and AI tends to expose admin-ajax or REST endpoints without authorisation. These are the exact gaps automated bots probe. We test for them directly rather than assuming the code is safe because it runs.
Should I rescue the site or rebuild it? #
It depends on how much of the AI output is salvageable. We run the audit first and give you an honest split, what to keep, what to rewrite, and what to throw away, with the reasoning. We do not push a rebuild to inflate the engagement.
Do you also clean up AI-generated content? #
Yes. We deduplicate near-identical AI pages that cannibalise each other, correct hallucinated facts and fake statistics, and consolidate thin pages into pages that can actually rank and get cited.
How long does an AI-site rescue take? #
A focused remediation is usually one to two weeks after the audit, depending on how much generated code and content needs rewriting. Emergency work, for example a broken checkout or an active security incident, is triaged first.
What does it cost? #
Pricing is individual and set after the audit, because the cost depends entirely on how much of the AI output has to be rewritten. The audit itself defines the scope before any repair work starts.

Need an FAQ tailored to your industry and market? We can build one aligned with your business goals.

Let’s discuss

Related Articles

Anne McCarthy's WordPress 7.1 roadmap is framed around collaboration, yet real-time collaboration is the one feature that keeps slipping. What actually ships on 19 August 2026, and what the canary-deployment debate says about how WordPress is built.
wordpress

The WordPress 7.1 roadmap

Anne McCarthy's WordPress 7.1 roadmap is framed around collaboration, yet real-time collaboration is the one feature that keeps slipping. What actually ships on 19 August 2026, and what the canary-deployment debate says about how WordPress is built.

A single week in June 2026 saw the Awesome Motive CDN breach, the ShapedPlugin build pipeline compromise, and a 13-year backdoor campaign exposed. The common thread: the official update channel was the attack vector. What store owners should actually change.
security

WordPress supply chain attacks in 2026

A single week in June 2026 saw the Awesome Motive CDN breach, the ShapedPlugin build pipeline compromise, and a 13-year backdoor campaign exposed. The common thread: the official update channel was the attack vector. What store owners should actually change.

The 2026 debate over how to serve content to AI agents conflates three different layers. A practitioner view from a stack that already serves clean semantic HTML and Schema on Cloudflare.
technology

Serving content to AI agents: HTML vs Markdown, and where OKF actually fits

The 2026 debate over how to serve content to AI agents conflates three different layers. A practitioner view from a stack that already serves clean semantic HTML and Schema on Cloudflare.