AI Transparency Policy

Illustration generated with AI

EN

AI Transparency Policy

5.00 /5 - (17 votes )
5min read
Reference

#AI Transparency Policy of WPPoland.com

This policy explains how WPPoland uses artificial intelligence in producing content published on wppoland.com, who holds editorial responsibility for it, and how we label material that is generated or assisted by AI. We prepared the document with the transparency obligations of Article 50 of the EU AI Act, that is Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, in mind.

#§1. How we use AI in content production

  1. We treat AI tools as support for editorial craft, not as an autonomous author. They help us with research, drafting article structure, translating across the six language versions of the site, and preparing visual material.
  2. AI does not make a standalone decision to publish. Before anything goes live, a person reads it, corrects it, and approves it.
  3. We do not publish content we cannot verify on the merits. Technical claims, figures, and legal references are checked against primary sources.

#§2. Editorial oversight and responsibility

  1. All content published on the site undergoes human editorial review. The review covers factual accuracy, alignment with our practical experience, and consistency with our brand standards.
  2. Editorial responsibility for published material rests with WPPoland Mariusz Szatkowski, as the publisher of wppoland.com.
  3. Article 50(4) of the AI Act provides that the obligation to disclose AI use when generating or manipulating text published to inform the public on matters of public interest does not apply where the content has undergone human review or editorial control and a natural or legal person holds editorial responsibility. Our process, grounded in human oversight and clear publisher responsibility, meets that condition. We publish this policy anyway, because we treat openness as a standard we hold ourselves to.

#§3. Labelling visual material

  1. Images that are fully AI-generated, and images that are substantially modified using AI, carry a visible caption next to the material (for example a note stating that the illustration was created with AI involvement).
  2. Where technically feasible, we attach a machine-readable marking, in particular C2PA Content Credentials or appropriate file metadata, so that the origin of the material can be verified automatically.
  3. Minor, assistive edits (cropping, exposure correction, noise reduction) that do not substantially change the meaning or context of the material are treated as ordinary processing and do not require separate marking within the meaning of Article 50.

#§4. No AI chatbot

  1. The wppoland.com site does not operate a chatbot or any other AI system that interacts directly with users.
  2. For that reason, the Article 50(1) obligation to inform people that they are interacting with an AI system does not apply to our site.
  3. Should we add such a feature in the future, we will clearly inform users that they are talking to an AI system and update this policy.

#§5. The two-layer approach

For labelling AI content we apply a two-layer approach, in line with the structure of Article 50:

  1. Machine-readable layer: C2PA Content Credentials, watermarking, or metadata, allowing machines to detect that material was generated or manipulated by AI, as far as is technically feasible.
  2. Human-facing layer: a clear, visible disclosure for the reader. A short “made with AI” note on its own, without the technical layer, may be insufficient, so we aim to use both layers together.
  1. This policy addresses the transparency obligations of Article 50 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (the AI Act).
  2. The AI Act entered into force on 1 August 2024, and the Article 50 transparency obligations start applying on 2 August 2026.
  3. Breaches of the Article 50 obligations fall under Article 99 of the AI Act and can reach up to EUR 15,000,000 or 3% of total worldwide annual turnover, whichever is higher.
  4. The European Commission and the AI Office are finalising a code of practice and guidelines on the marking and detection of AI content. Once published, we will adapt our technical solutions to the detailed requirements.
  5. In Poland, the process of designating a national supervisory authority for the AI Act is under way. Once its name is finalised, we will add it to this policy.

We cover the labelling of AI content under Article 50 of the AI Act in detail in our guide: labelling AI-generated content under the AI Act.

#§8. Sources

  1. Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (the AI Act), text on EUR-Lex: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj.
  2. European Commission, regulatory framework for AI: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/regulatory-framework-ai.
  3. C2PA (Coalition for Content Provenance and Authenticity): https://c2pa.org/.

#§9. Policy updates

  1. We update this policy in response to legal, technological, or organizational changes in how AI is used on the site.
  2. The current version is always available on wppoland.com.
  3. Material changes are communicated on the Service.

#Contact

WPPoland Mariusz Szatkowski ul. Starowiejska 16/2 81-356 Gdynia, Poland e-mail: [email protected]

Related cluster

Explore other WordPress services and knowledge base

Strengthen your business with professional technical support in key areas of the WordPress ecosystem.

Recommendations from LinkedIn

Recommendations and reviews of working with WPPoland

Selected recommendations from WordPress, WordCamp and e-commerce leaders - with a focus on delivery on time, technical depth, and a business-driven approach to WordPress development.

Karolina Czapla

Karolina Czapla

Marketing Strategist – Performance & Digital Strategy

“Working with Mariusz on WordCamp has shown me how rare it is to combine deep technical skill with genuine leadership. He plans, coordinates and delivers with precision, while giving the team space to grow and contribute....”

Co‑organiser, WordCamp Gdynia 2024 & 2025

Argert Boja

Argert Boja

Senior Full‑Stack Developer

“Mariusz is the teammate everyone hopes for: strong full‑stack WordPress skills, clear explanations and a positive attitude even under pressure. He moves easily between custom plugins, performance work and Gutenberg layou...”

Worked alongside Mariusz on WordPress projects

Daniel Blossfeld

Daniel Blossfeld

Process Optimization & Digitalization Consultant

“I had the pleasure of working with Mariusz for almost three years. During that time, his WordPress development skills proved invaluable across a range of projects, from website builds to online member areas and even Shop...”

Mariusz was his client for WordPress work

Jessica Di Pasquale

Jessica Di Pasquale

Leading SEO initiatives with data-driven growth strategies.

“Mariusz is a very skilled, patient and expert guy. Always ready to help and to fix errors, I really appreciated working with him. He is such a great colleague!”

Managed Mariusz directly

Belinda Koch

Belinda Koch

Web-Tracking Analyst at TUI

“Mariusz is a great person to work with. He is extremely motivated to learn new things and share his knowledge, and is very knowledgeable on a wide range of topics. We worked together on digital analytics and tracking top...”

Worked with Mariusz on digital analytics and tracking topics

Paweł Lewczuk

Paweł Lewczuk

Front-end developer, WordPress developer

“I collaborated with Mariusz on several projects and our cooperation was always exemplary. I believe there are many more joint projects ahead of us. Highly recommended!”

Mariusz was Paweł's client

Related Articles

From 2 August 2026, Article 50 of the AI Act imposes transparency duties on companies that use AI. What you actually have to label, when editorial review lifts the obligation, and how to put two layers of labelling into practice for media, marketing and agencies.
ai

The AI Act and labelling AI-generated content

From 2 August 2026, Article 50 of the AI Act imposes transparency duties on companies that use AI. What you actually have to label, when editorial review lifts the obligation, and how to put two layers of labelling into practice for media, marketing and agencies.

WordPress market share has fallen for six straight months, to 41.9 percent. A source-backed senior take: why this is not the death of the platform, who is really gaining, and what it changes for businesses and WordPress developers.
web-development

Is WordPress dying? What the W3Techs market-share data actually says

WordPress market share has fallen for six straight months, to 41.9 percent. A source-backed senior take: why this is not the death of the platform, who is really gaining, and what it changes for businesses and WordPress developers.

A source-backed senior take on the AI productivity paradox in 2026. Why generative AI helps but rarely explodes output, and what that means for WordPress agencies running WordPress 7.0 AI features.
ai

The AI productivity paradox: why generative AI will not 10x your team overnight

A source-backed senior take on the AI productivity paradox in 2026. Why generative AI helps but rarely explodes output, and what that means for WordPress agencies running WordPress 7.0 AI features.